Drawing for CADA DIA, UN PASEO

USPTO serial 85254776

CADA DIA, UN PASEO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YARD, JOHN S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CADA DIA, UN PASEO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy G. Marino, Esq.

AMY G. MARINO, ESQ. WILLIAMS MULLEN222 CENTRAL PARK AVE STE 1700VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23462-3035UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Bathroom tissue; Disposable diapers; Disposable wipes not impregnated with chemicals or compounds; Facial tissue; Napkin paper; Paper diapers; Paper hand-towels; Paper liners for diapers; Paper napkins; Paper pads for changing diapers; Paper tissues; Paper tissues for cosmetic use; Paper towels; Toilet paper; Toilet seat cover paper; Toilet tissueACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2012MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 12, 2012ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 11, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 24, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 24, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 7, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 7, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance