Drawing for CUERVO '58

USPTO serial 85255126

CUERVO '58

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CUERVO '58?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4011UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beer, brewed malt based alcoholic beverage in the nature of a beer; malt beer and non-alcoholic malt beverage; non-alcoholic malt coolersACTIVE—
033Tequila; alcoholic cocktails based on tequila; alcoholic beverages, namely, tequila extractsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 2, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 1, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 27, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 27, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 16, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 15, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 21, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 21, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 29, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 27, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 27, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 27, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 1, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 29, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 28, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 28, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 28, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 28, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 20, 2011PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 7, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 7, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 23, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance