Drawing for CHAOS THEORY

USPTO serial 85255269

CHAOS THEORY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHAOS THEORY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raj Abhyanker

RAJ ABHYANKER LEGALFORCE RAPC WORLDWIDE, P.C.446 E SOUTHERN AVETEMPE, AZ 85282UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment in the nature of a live musical performer, musical band or musical group; entertainment in the nature of live performances by a musical artist, musical group or musical band; entertainment in the nature of live visual and audio performances by a musical artist, musical group and musical band; entertainment, namely, live music concerts; entertainment, namely, personal appearances by a musician, musical group or musical band; entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring non-downloadable musical performances, musical videos, related film clips, photographs, and other multimedia materialsACTIVEFeb 1, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 16, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 2, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 1, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 14, 2013EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 27, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 11, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 8, 2013MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 6, 2013RGTTREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Feb 5, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2013APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 21, 2012TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2012MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Oct 17, 2012ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Mar 21, 2012GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2012GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2012CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 8, 2012TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2011WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2011WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 30, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 30, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 9, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance