Drawing for BARRICADE

USPTO serial 85255646

BARRICADE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BARRICADE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lauren A. Dienes-Middlen

LAUREN A. DIENES-MIDDLEN WORLD WRESTLING ENTERTAINMENT, INC.1241 E MAIN STSTAMFORD, CT 06902-3520UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Cardboard and paper hangtags; packaging, namely, blister cards, paper for wrapping and packaging, paper pouches for packaging, plastic bags for packaging, plastic bubble packs for wrapping or packaging; collector albums, namely, for sticker collectable cards, photo collectables; labels, namely, printed paper labels, printed shipping labels; folders; plastic bags for general use; stickers; framed pictures; pens; pencils; posters; notebooks; trading cards; calendars; paper tablecloths; photographs; newspapers; postcards; greeting cards; pictures; decals; coloring books; books featuring pictorial biographies; comic books; book covers; paper book markers; paper lunch bags; picture books; memo pads; date books; address books; agenda books; pencil sharpeners; rubber stamps; stamp pads; collector stamps, namely, commemorative stamp sheets; customized personal checks; checkbook covers and return address labels not of textile; paper banners; printed paper signs for doors; pencil cases; scribble pad; photo albums; bumper stickers; window decals; lithographs; paper party bags; stencils for tracing designs onto paper; paper gift wrap; paper cake decorationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 30, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 30, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 28, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 2, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 13, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 15, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 15, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 19, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 19, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 19, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 11, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 3, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 26, 2011CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
May 26, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 26, 2011GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2011GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2011CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
May 18, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance