USPTO serial 85256246
TRU IMAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRU IMAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle L. Gross
Pacer K. Udall BOOTH UDALL FULLER, PLC1255 W. RIO SALADO PKWY., STE. 215TEMPE, AZ 85281UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Dye toners; Filled ink cartridges; Ink cartridges for printers; Ink jet cartridges; Inks, toners and dyes for use with or on textiles and fabrics; Photocopier toner; Photocopier toner in cartridges; Printing toner; Toner; Toner cartridges; Toner for copiers; Toners; Xerographic toners | ACTIVE | Sep 27, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2011 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |