USPTO serial 85257203
DATAPIPE ONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4632652Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 4, 2014
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DATAPIPE ONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Jersey City, NJ
Jersey City, NJ
Jersey City, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Glenn S. Bacal
GLENN S. BACAL BACAL LAW GROUP, P.C.6991 E CAMELBACK RD STE D102SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85251-2465UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Electronic data storage services, namely, storage of electronic data at data centers; computer services in the nature of providing an integrated suite of data and computer related services, namely, electronic data storage | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2011 |
| 042 | Computer services in the nature of providing an integrated suite of data and computer related services, namely, providing computer security consulting in the area of data storage, online security and information security vulnerability; providing a secure and safe environment for the information technology systems of others, namely, providing computer co-location services in the nature of providing facilities for the location of computer servers and equipment of others; computer services in the nature of monitoring and managing computer network systems; network security services in the nature of computer network security services, namely, restricting access to and by computer networks to and of undesired web sites, media and individuals and facilities; security management services, namely, computer consultation in the field of computer security; disaster recovery services, namely, computer disaster recovery planning and recovery of computer data; server management services, namely, hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; data backup services, namely, back-up services for computer hard drive data; web site hosting services; computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of the information technology cloud computing systems of others; technical support services, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of public and private cloud computing and application systems; consulting services in the field of cloud computing, namely, consulting in connection with cloud computing applications and networks; technical consulting services in the fields of public and private cloud computing, namely, consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; technical support services, namely, monitoring of network systems, servers and web and database applications and notification of related events and alerts; providing on-demand resource allocation for computer systems including access to virtual servers and virtual machines; hosting the software and other computer applications of others on a virtual private and public server; technical support services for hardware, software and operating systems in the nature of monitoring, diagnosing and problem resolution related to software applications; computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of electronic messaging systems of others including troubleshooting, optimizing, patching, hardening, storage management, mailbox movement, installation and configuration and migration of electronic messages and message systems, such as e-mail | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 1, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 10, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 26, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 11, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 24, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |