USPTO serial 85257455
PERVASIVE COMPUTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HALMEN, KATHERINE E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERVASIVE COMPUTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan M. Gelchinsky
JONATHAN M. GELCHINSKY FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER L.L901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4432UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Charitable fund-raising; funding for education or training, namely, charitable fundraising to support education and training | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | Electronic transmission of voice, images, text, and computer data; telecommunication using computer terminals, namely, communications by computer terminals; communications by computer terminals, namely, electrical communication by voice and image using computer terminals; providing user access to a global computer network; telecommunication, excluding broadcasting, namely, telecommunication in the nature of transmission of information by means of an electronic telecommunications network, telecommunication access services, telecommunications by email, providing telephone conferencing services, audio visual conferencing services and video conferencing services; broadcasting, namely, internet broadcasting services; news services for communications media, namely, news agency services for electronic transmission; telecommunications consultancy in the field of communication networks; providing information about telecommunications in the field of the internet and other computer telecommunication networks; rental of access time to global computer networks for accessing electronic commerce platforms | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2012 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |