Drawing for NETBLU

USPTO serial 85257786

NETBLU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NETBLU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph J. Weissman

Joseph J. Weissman JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP403 E MADISON ST STE 400TAMPA, FL 33602-4614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Online networking services for professional personnel including professional personnel working in business facilitiesACTIVE—
038Instant messaging services and audio and video broadcasting services over the internet for professional personnel including those working in business facilities; Computer services, namely, providing an online website for professionals, including those working in business facilities, to participate in video teleconferencingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 21, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 14, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 26, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 24, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 24, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 26, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 24, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 10, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 9, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 8, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 16, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 16, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 20, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 18, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 24, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 28, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 18, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 18, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 17, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 14, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 26, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 9, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 9, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance