USPTO serial 85258065
MASITEK MOST ACCURATE SENSOR IMPACT TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4558120Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 1, 2014
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MASITEK MOST ACCURATE SENSOR IMPACT TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Moncton, New Brunswick, CA
MONCTON, NB, CA
MONCTON, NB, CA
MONCTON, NB, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colleen Caissie-Dupuis
10 EASTWOOD AVENUEMONCTON, NEW BRUNSWICK, E1A3P2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic real-time wireless sensor used in industrial and manufacturing facilities for system diagnostics, monitoring of impact and vertical load measurements, temperature, humidity and other system fluctuations to identify and quantify damage to fragile goods and products in production packaging and distribution systems; and associated operational computer software for data transfer from and to handheld devices and from and to personal computers for statistical, performance, and auditing analysis and reporting | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 652383 N.B. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by MASITEK INSTRUMENTS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MASITEK INSTRUMENTS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MASITEK INSTRUMENTS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MASITEK MOST ACCURATE SENSOR IMPACT TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 15, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |