USPTO serial 85259210
JACK CHICAGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEETE, KYLE C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JACK CHICAGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Series of musical sound recordings and phonograph records featuring music; audio-visual recordings featuring music and music-based entertainment; downloadable sound recordings and audio-visual recordings featuring music and music-based entertainment via a global computer network and wireless devices | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, live musical performances and live public appearances by a professional entertainer; entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances by musicians and actors; providing non-downloadable prerecorded music and audio-visual entertainment via a global computer network and wireless devices; providing information regarding a musical artist via a global computer network and wireless devices | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |