USPTO serial 85259335
TSC TRACTOR SUPPLY CO.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TSC TRACTOR SUPPLY CO.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P. Felber, Jr.
ROBERT P FELBER JR WALLER LANSDEN DORTCH & DAVIS LLPSTE 2700511 UNION STNASHVILLE, TN 37219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Bottle openers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tractor Supply Co. of Texas, LP
- Other trademarks owned by Tractor Supply Co. of Texas, LP
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named TSC TRACTOR SUPPLY CO.
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 24, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 23, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 28, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 9, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 9, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 2, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |