Drawing for CATHERINE ELIZABETH

USPTO serial 85259715

CATHERINE ELIZABETH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CATHERINE ELIZABETH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barbara A. Friedman

BARBARA A. FRIEDMAN EDELL, SHAPIRO & FINNAN, LLC1901 RESEARCH BLVD STE 400ROCKVILLE, MD 20850-6120UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Face creams; eye cream; beauty lotions; lotions for cosmetic purposes; facial lotions; eye lotions; beauty serums; non-medicated anti-aging serum; non-medicated lotions and serums for use on the skinACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 9, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 9, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 26, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2011TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Mar 16, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance