Drawing for CRAB RANGOON

USPTO serial 85260850

CRAB RANGOON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TENG, SIMON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRAB RANGOON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam J. Bruno

ADAM J BRUNO BAY STATE IP LLC201 WASHINGTON ST SUITE 2600ONE BOSTON PLACEBOSTON, MA 02108

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Prepared deep-fried dumplings consisting primarily of crab, cheese and vegetables in a flour wrapACTIVEJan 1, 1981

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 11, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 27, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 27, 2012EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 12, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2012GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2012GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2012CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 2, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 31, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 31, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 31, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 31, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 31, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2011AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2011IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Aug 2, 2011AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 2, 2011IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 1, 2011EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 18, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance