USPTO serial 85261231
E-TERRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E-TERRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Anchorage, AK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher D. Cyphers
CHRISTOPHER D. CYPHERS FRONTIER LAW GROUP333 W 4TH AVE STE 311ANCHORAGE, AK 99501-2341UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, programs, groupware, and shareware, together with instructional manuals, sold as a unit, for use in creating, producing, displaying, designing, transmitting, receiving, storing, searching, retrieving, managing, analyzing and manipulating a wide variety of software applications, websites, databases, digital information, graphics and other data to support geographic information systems and automated mapping, facilities management and other map-enabled applications | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2000 |
| 035 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION; RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING A WIDE VARIETY OF SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS, WEBSITES, DATABASES, DIGITAL INFORMATION, GRAPHICS AND OTHER DATA TO SUPPORT GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND AUTOMATED MAPPING, FACILITIES MANAGEMENT AND OTHER MAP-ENABLED APPLICATIONS; COMMERCIAL ADMINISTRATION OF THE LICENSING OF THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS, NAMELY, A WIDE VARIETY OF SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS, WEBSITES, DATABASES, DIGITAL INFORMATION, GRAPHICS AND OTHERS DATA TO SUPPORT GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND AUTOMATED MAPPING, FACILITIES MANAGEMENT AND OTHER MAP-ENABLED APPLICATIONS | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2000 |
| 041 | Computer education and training services, namely, classes, courses and seminars in the use and operation of a wide variety of software applications, websites, databases, digital information, graphics and other data to support geographic information systems and automated mapping, facilities management and other map-enabled applications | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2000 |
| 042 | Computer system analysis, data conversion, software consultation, installation, updating, programming, integration, maintenance, design and implementation services, all done for others, for a wide variety of software applications to support geographic information systems and automated mapping, facilities management and other map-enabled applications; providing on-line data bases in the field of geographic information and mapping, search engines and temporary use of non-downloadable computer software to support geographic information systems and automated mapping, facilities management and other map-enabled applications | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | RGOA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |