USPTO serial 85262407
BABY GOURMET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 16, 2013
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BABY GOURMET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Alberta T6E 5Z8, CA
Alberta T6E 5Z8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Damon Ashcraft
J. DAMON ASHCRAFT SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.400 E VAN BUREN ST # 10PHOENIX, AZ 85004-2223UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | (Based on Sections 1(a) and (44(e)) Online retail stores and retail services by direct solicitation by sales agents featuring baby food | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 18, 2011 |
| 041 | (Based on Sections 1(a) and (44(e)) Providing online journals, namely, blogs about the nutrition, wellness and healthcare of infants, babies, and children | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 18, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Baby Gourmet Foods Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Baby Gourmet Foods Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Baby Gourmet Foods Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named BABY GOURMET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 29, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |