USPTO serial 85263405
ENABLING THE VIDEO ECONOMY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENABLING THE VIDEO ECONOMY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane J. Mason
DIANE J. MASON LECLAIRRYAN44 MONTGOMERY ST.STE 1800SAN FRANCISCO CA 94104, CA 94104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for use in universal media transcoding for internet, mobile and broadcast video applications; computer hardware and software for use by cable, satellite, terrestrial broadcasters, telephone carriers and wireless telecommunications operators for use in video delivery, for use in video compression, and for use in video stream processing and band width expansion; computer hardware, namely, encoders, video and audio input processors, ethernet adapters, and embedded software for use in the compression and decompression of video and audio data; electronic circuit boards for the compression, decompression, multiplexing, recoding, playback, transmissions, reception, switching, and demultiplexing of digital, audio, video and data signals and parts thereof; computer hardware and software for use in capturing and digitizing video and audio content, for use in controlling professional videotape recorders and encoders, for use in editing digital ad content, for use in creating video-on-demand content, for use in operating embedded decoder cards, for use in automating and streamlining graphical user interface software, and for managing computer networks; electronic system, namely, computer hardware and software for use in receiving and decoding MPEG program streams via an IP interface for delivery to video and audio entertainment subscribers; electronic system, namely, computer hardware and software for use in transcoding and transmultiplexing of digital audio, video and electronic asset metadata; computer software for use in scheduling the recording of broadcast channels by video on demand service providers; electronic systems comprising computer hardware and peripherals for the reception, remultiplexing, descrambling, decoding, compression, multiplexing, scrambling, transmission and monitoring of standard and high definition digital video, audio and data signals and parts thereof; video input and output cards for use by telecommunications and broadcast companies for transmission of voice, data, graphics and video signals; optical transmitters and optical receivers; computer hardware and software for use in variable bitrate encoding and statistical multiplexing; amplifiers; preamplifiers; power supplies; computer hardware and software for use in monitoring the status of network management systems and video and audio services and systems; computer hardware and software for use in controlling video servers; video splitters and combiners; computer hardware, namely, communication access nodes for transport of voice, video and high-speed data in wide area networks, local area networks, cable networks, and broadband networks; digital compression units for processing of digital music and video images; computer software for use in compression of digital music and video; computer hardware, software and modems for use in delivery of high speed broadband signals; equipment for use with broadband networks, namely, fiber optics, cable, satellite and wireless telecommunications networks, for use in providing access and transmitting signals, namely, headend controllers, monitors, compression devices, mutliplexers, scramblers and modulators; optical, digital and cable transmitters using high speed broadband technology; headend controllers, computer hardware and computer software for the management and transmission of data over fiber optics, cable, satellite and wireless telecommunications networks; broadband network interfaces; computer hardware and software for managing various elements of a wireless, high speed, broadband communication network, and parts and manuals sold therewith as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Fiber optic and digital video system network design for others; integration of computer systems and networks, namely, integration of fiber optic and digital video systems; services to communication system providers and users, namely, designing fiber optic, cable, satellite, and wireless high speed, broadband communication systems for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Harmonic Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Harmonic Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ENABLING THE VIDEO ECONOMY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 16, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 30, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 30, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |