USPTO serial 85263877
PERSONALIZED CANCER CARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERSONALIZED CANCER CARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian L. Petrequin, Esq.
Brian L. Petrequin, Esq. Greenberg Traurig, LLP500 Campus Drive, Suite 400Florham Park, NJ 07932UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed publications, namely, peer reviewed medical magazines, journals, newsletters, feature reports, monographs, and printed supplements to the foregoing in the fields of hematology and oncology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2020 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 29, 2020 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 2, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 2, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 22, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 20, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 30, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |