Drawing for TOTHECUBE

USPTO serial 85264222

TOTHECUBE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOTHECUBE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William C. Wright

WILLIAM C. WRIGHT EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP60 E 42ND ST STE 2410NEW YORK, NY 10165-0011UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Providing information in the field of real estate via the InternetACTIVE—
042Providing an Internet website that features information on interior home design featuring home furnishings, and interior decorationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 20, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 30, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 29, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 20, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 20, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 18, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 9, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 21, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 21, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 12, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 6, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 6, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 18, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 18, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 18, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 13, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 18, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 13, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 29, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 24, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 16, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance