USPTO serial 85264379
IOT REUSABLE ASSET MANAGEMENT PLATFORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IOT REUSABLE ASSET MANAGEMENT PLATFORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Hale
JOHN S HALE GIPPLE & HALE6665A OLD DOMINION DRIVEMCLEAN, VA 22101-4508UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, SOFTWARE FOR CONSUMABLE AND REUSABLE ASSET TRACKING FROM INITIAL TAGGING AND LABELING, THROUGH DISTRIBUTION CENTERS OUT INTO PURCHASERS AND FOR REUSABLE ASSETS TRACKING THROUGH MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR TO DESTRUCTION OR REDISTRIBUTION | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ONLINE, NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR CONSUMABLE AND REUSABLE ASSET TRACKING FROM INITIAL TAGGING AND LABELING, THROUGH DISTRIBUTION CENTERS OUT INTO PURCHASERS AND FOR REUSABLE ASSETS TRACKING THROUGH MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR TO DESTRUCTION OR REDISTRIBUTION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | RGTT | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |