Drawing for EPSILON SHIFT 365

USPTO serial 85267870

EPSILON SHIFT 365

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, JANET H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPSILON SHIFT 365?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John C. Cain

JOHN C. CAIN WONG, CABELLO, LUTSCH, RUTHERFORD & BRUCCULERI, L.20333 SH 249 STE 600HOUSTON, TX 77070UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising and marketing consultancy; Advertising and marketing services provided by means of indirect methods of marketing communications, namely, social media, search engine marketing, inquiry marketing, internet marketing, mobile marketing, blogging and other forms of passive,sharable or viral communications channels; Advertising and marketing services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others; Advertising, marketing and promotion services; Analysis of market research data and statistics; Business marketing and direct mail consulting services; Business marketing consulting services; Business marketing services; Consulting services in the field of internet marketing; Creative marketing design services; Customer loyalty services and customer club services, for commercial, promotional and/or advertising purposes; Development of marketing strategies and concepts; Development of marketing strategies, concepts and tactics, namely, audience development, brand awareness, online community building and digital word of mouth communications; Direct marketing; Direct marketing advertising for others; Direct marketing consulting services; Mailing list preparation; Marketing analysis services; Marketing consulting; Marketing plan development; Marketing research services; Marketing services, namely, consumer marketing research; On-line advertising and marketing services; Providing advertising service to distribute advertisements for display on Internet, namely, in websites, social conversations over the Internet, e-mails, microblogs, blogs, electronic messages, instant messages, text messages, multimedia messages,social networks, status updates, forums, electronic bulletin boards; Providing business marketing informationACTIVE—
042Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in database management and for word processing in the fields of marketing, promotion and customer communications; Database development services; Designing websites for advertising purposes; Graphic design services; Maintenance of on-line databases for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 9, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 30, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 18, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 29, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance