Drawing for RAMIS

USPTO serial 85268185

RAMIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TENG, SIMON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAMIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew R. Jenkins

MATTHEW R. JENKINS JACOX, MECKSTROTH & JENKINS2310 FAR HILLS AVE STE 2DAYTON, OH 45419-1575UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical and surgical apparatus and instruments, namely, orthopedic spinal fixation device and instrument used in orthopedic transplant and/or implant surgeryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 1, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 30, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 30, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 22, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 15, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 27, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 24, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 1, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 20, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 20, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 31, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 29, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 29, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 17, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 21, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 1, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 17, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 27, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 21, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance