USPTO serial 85268541
CAVEMAN FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAVEMAN FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID HOCHMAN
DAVID HOCHMAN Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, LLP11400 W. Olympic Blvd., 9th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90064UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 29, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 25, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 20, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 24, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 10, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 20, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2014 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 19, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 19, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |