USPTO serial 85268874
EPOCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHINER, MARK W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EPOCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan K. Wheelock
BRYAN K. WHEELOCK HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.7700 BONHOMME AVE STE 400SAINT LOUIS, MO 63105-0032UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | MAGNETIC NAVIGATION SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF MAGNETIC DEVICES AND CONTROLS FOR CONTROLLING THE POSITION AND/OR ORIENTATION OF MAGNETIC SUBSTANCES AND DEVICES IN THE BODY; A LINE OF MAGNETIC MEDICAL DEVICES THAT CAN BE MAGNETICALLY NAVIGATED IN THE BODY FOR DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC PURPOSES; SHEATHS; CATHETERS; ENDOSCOPES; MAGNETS AND ELECTROMAGNETS FOR MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; ATHERECTOMY DEVICES; MEDICAL GUIDEWIRES; MEDICAL ELECTRODES; ELECTRODE CATHETERS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY CATHETERS; MEDICAL IMAGING APPARATUS; APPARATUS FOR POSITIONING MEDICAL DEVICES IN THE BODY; SYSTEMS FOR REMOTELY OPERATING MEDICAL DEVICES, NAMELY, DEVICES THAT REMOTELY ADVANCE AND RETRACT AND/OR REMOTELY ACTUATE MEDICAL DEVICES; MEDICAL IMAGE NETWORKING APPARATUS AND MEDICAL IMAGE NETWORKING SYSTEMS COMPRISING COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND ELECTRONIC DISPLAY MONITORS FOR MEDICAL IMAGES FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH COMPUTER-ASSISTED REMOTELY AND LOCALLY CONTROLLED MEDICAL AND SURGICAL PROCEDURES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 30, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 30, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 3, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |