USPTO serial 85269285
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Edison, NJ
Edison, NJ
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Automatic telephone dialers; Telephone call router, for home and office touchtone phones, for international and long distance calls made from various telephony platforms including VoIP platform without the requirement for internet; Telephone call routers for long distance calls made through PSTN and VoIP platforms from any touchtone phone without a requirement for internet access | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Hosted PBX services; PBX dialing services; Voice over internet protocol (VOIP) services; Voice over IP services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for contact center multi channel communication as well as transactional base applications which capture, analyze and impact customer interactions, these software features also improve agent performance while optimizing operations, as well as enable organizations to comply with regulations, boost customer experience, and drive revenue growth | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2013 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 29, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 7, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 7, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 30, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 27, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |