USPTO serial 85272215
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Accessories, namely, necklaces and watch straps all of precious metals, silver, gold, brass, metal and leather; accessories, namely, key holders of precious metals, silver, gold; jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, t-shirts, short sleeve shirts, long sleeve shirts, tops, cardigans, jackets, light jackets, dresses, skirts; outerwear, namely, jackets, jackets with hoods, tops with hoods; leather jackets; leather skirts; knitwear, namely, cardigans, jackets, light jackets, and dresses; denim jeans, denim skirts, denim jackets; underwear; caps; headwear; scarves, namely, cloth wraps; garters; stocking garters; suspenders; hat bands; belts for clothing; footwear; shoes | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services in the fields of clothing, jewelry and fashion accessories; online retail store services in the fields of clothing, jewelry and fashion accessories; wholesale store services in the fields of clothing, jewelry and fashion accessories; online wholesale store services in the fields of clothing, jewelry and fashion accessories | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2016 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2015 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |