USPTO serial 85275297
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Wright, Esq.
MARK A WRIGHT MCLANE GRAF RAULERSON & MIDDLETON PAPO BOX 326900 ELM STREETMANCHESTER, NH 03105-0326| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Application service provider featuring an application programming interface (API) software that allows web-users to download an applet that accesses fields of information unique to the user's computer and further validates the identity of the user's computer for purposes of avoiding user duplication and fraud prevention | ABANDONED | Mar 9, 2011 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 3, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |