USPTO serial 85275475
BIZPOLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUSTASON, ANNE C
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIZPOLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CALGARY, ALBERTA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TERESA C. TUCKER
TERESA C. TUCKER GROSSMAN, TUCKER, PERREAULT & PFLEGER, PLLC55 S COMMERCIAL STMANCHESTER, NH 03101-2606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE (SaaS) PROVIDER, NAMELY, PROVIDING ORGANIZATIONS ACCESS OVER THE INTERNET AND MOBILE TO APPLICATIONS IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS AND OFFICE MANAGEMENT, SPECIFICALLY INTERNAL OPERATIONS, COMMUNICATIONS, DOCUMENT STORAGE, SCHEDULING, ASSET MANAGEMENT, INVENTORY MANAGEMENT, RESUME MANAGEMENT, EMPLOYEE MANAGEMENT, EMPLOYEE TIME TRACKING, AND BOOKEEPING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |