Drawing for VENUENET LITE

USPTO serial 85275667

VENUENET LITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VENUENET LITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian D. Brown

JENNIFER DANIEL COLLINS Faegre Baker Daniels LLP1700 Lincoln Street3200 Wells Fargo CenterDENVER, CO 80203-4500

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038television transmission services, namely, direct access sports transmission servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 2, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 2, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 30, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 5, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 5, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 31, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 31, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 30, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Mar 29, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 28, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance