USPTO serial 85275915
NANOATR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4184484Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 31, 2012
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NANOATR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ANDOVER, MA
Fremont, CA
MERCURY SYSTEMS - TRUSTED MISSION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Fremont, CA
Other trademarks owned by MERCURY SYSTEMS - TRUSTED MISSION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Fremont, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia Johnson Walden
Cynthia Johnson Walden Fish & Richardson P.C.PO Box 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware sealed chassis having a thermal and kinetic management system comprised of a robust, sealed and conduction cooled environment for interchangeable electronics modules, within the enclosure, and an external heat exchanger and input-output connector panel, combined in a single, small package | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 6, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MERCURY SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Themis Computer
- Other trademarks owned by MERCURY SYSTEMS - TRUSTED MISSION SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Themis Computer
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named NANOATR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2026 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 31, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 2, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 25, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2012 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |