CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ENERGENIUS SUPERSTORE

USPTO serial 85275958

ENERGENIUS SUPERSTORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENERGENIUS SUPERSTORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Bradford

Michael J. Bradford LUEDEKA NEELY GROUP, PCPO BOX 1871KNOXVILLE, TN 37901-1871UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services provided from a conventional storefront and from an on-line, web-based virtual storefront, both featuring water and energy conservation products, weatherization products, and energy efficient lightingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 23, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 21, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 26, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 6, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 14, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 14, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 22, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 16, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 16, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 25, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 20, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2012EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
May 30, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 11, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 6, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 29, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance