Drawing for WHAT JESUS WOULD DO

USPTO serial 85276512

WHAT JESUS WOULD DO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KERTGATE, AMY L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WHAT JESUS WOULD DO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable graphics for mobile phonesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 13, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 18, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Dec 27, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 13, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 13, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 13, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Nov 28, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 28, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Nov 7, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 7, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 7, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Jun 23, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 23, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 23, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 23, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 5, 2011AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Apr 5, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 4, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Mar 29, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 29, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance