Drawing for PHYTOSTYLING

USPTO serial 85276761

PHYTOSTYLING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MILTON, PRISCILLA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHYTOSTYLING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Milena S. Mishev

Milena S. Mishev McCarthy Fingar LLP11 Martine Avenue12th FloorWhite Plains, NY 10606-1934

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair care products, namely, non medicated hair care preparations, hair lotions, hair creams, hair oils, hair shampoos, hair sprays, non medicated hair balms, hair conditioners, hair rinses, styling lotions, hair styling glaze, hair styling foams, hair gels, hair tonics, hair moisturizing creams, hair shine waxACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 15, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 15, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 5, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 3, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Feb 3, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Feb 3, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 20, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 18, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jul 18, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jul 18, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 1, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 30, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 30, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 30, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 7, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 6, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 2, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 2, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 29, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jun 12, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 12, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 20, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 18, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 18, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 18, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 9, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 14, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 14, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 12, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 12, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 12, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 5, 2011AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Apr 5, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 4, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Apr 1, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Mar 31, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 29, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance