Drawing for INTERNATIONAL CAR OF THE YEAR AWARDS

USPTO serial 85278537

INTERNATIONAL CAR OF THE YEAR AWARDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INTERNATIONAL CAR OF THE YEAR AWARDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William M. Hanlon, Jr.

WILLIAM M. HANLON, JR. YOUNG, BASILE, HANLON & MACFARLANE, P.C.3001 W BIG BEAVER RD STE 624TROY, MI 48084-3107UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Services, namely, providing recognition and incentives by the way of awards for excellence in the field of automotive design and technology based on how well vehicles manufactured anywhere in the world, but sold in America as new model year production models or having a significant change in the design and/or technology, represent consumer lifestyles and establish an emotional connection between the vehicles and consumersACTIVEJan 8, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 25, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 29, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 29, 2011AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Apr 14, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 11, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Apr 1, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Mar 31, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 31, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance