USPTO serial 85278678
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda M. Byrne
LINDA M. BYRNE CRAWFORD MAUNU PLLC1150 NORTHLAND DR STE 100SAINT PAUL, MN 55120-1294UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed publications, namely, newsletters and brochures relating to patents, trademarks, copyrights and related intellectual property matters | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing online newsletters featuring articles and commentary in the field of patents, trademarks, copyrights and related intellectual property matters; providing online brochures relating to patents, trademarks, copyrights and related intellectual property matters | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Patent and trademark agent services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2011 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |