Drawing for WE SERVE TODAY FOR A SAFE TOMORROW

USPTO serial 85279437

WE SERVE TODAY FOR A SAFE TOMORROW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WE SERVE TODAY FOR A SAFE TOMORROW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Luna M. Samman

LUNA M. SAMMAN DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP1825 EYE ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-5403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Outsourcing services in the fields of airfield management, aviation, namely, airplane maintenance and repair, depot operations support and ground equipment maintenance and repair, aviation systems modification, repair, maintenance, training, and engineering; outsourcing services in the field of military base operations and maintenance; outsourcing services in the field of contingency support services for military operations; outsourcing services in the field of military base and airfield facilities management, military intelligence support services, international narcotics eradication, law enforcement and international peacekeeping training, transportation logistics support, personal protection services, physical security services including police and security mentoring and advising, procurement support services, and specialty aviation operation and related services, including fire suppression and plant eradication; outsourcing services in the field of translation, interpretation and language instruction services; military base, depot and airfield management; and outsourcing services in the field of destruction, safe handling, proper storage and securing of weaponsACTIVE—
037Providing aircraft and ground vehicle repair, maintenance, and modification services; aircraft and ground vehicle depot support services, namely, equipment maintenance and installation; aircraft engineering services, namely, providing technical advice in the field of aircraft reconfiguration overhaul and repair; and construction management servicesACTIVE—
041Providing translation, language interpretation and linguist services, namely, language instruction services; providing practical training and instruction of law enforcement, security and peacekeeping personnel; providing training and instruction in the field of the destruction, safe handling, proper storage and securing of weapons; and providing training in narcotics eradicationACTIVE—
043Emergency shelter services, namely, providing temporary housingACTIVE—
045Providing personal body guarding and security guarding for facilities; security services, namely, border protection services; fire fighting services; international narcotics eradication services, namely, providing police and civil protection services for use in narcotics operations; emergency and contingency support services, namely, providing executive protection, security guarding and security inspection; and military intelligence support services, namely, the gathering and analysis of military intelligenceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 10, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 8, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 7, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 7, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 7, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 8, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 13, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 22, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 8, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 7, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 7, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 7, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 11, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 23, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance