Drawing for WEBTAS

USPTO serial 85279617

WEBTAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEBTAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael C. Martensen

MICHAEL C. MARTENSEN MARTENSEN IP30 E KIOWA ST STE 101COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80903-1510UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer software development, computer programming and maintenance of computer software for visualization, integration and analysis of disparate data in a Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) compliant platformACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 3, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 8, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 31, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 31, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 16, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 15, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 24, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 24, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 1, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 30, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 30, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 2, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 7, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 7, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 17, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 23, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 23, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 16, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 2, 2013PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Nov 16, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 16, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 8, 2012FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2012PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Sep 25, 2012PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Sep 24, 2012APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 13, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2012ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Mar 11, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 11, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 11, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 19, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 2, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 2, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 1, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance