USPTO serial 85279765
FOODTOEAT.COM HUNGRY? GET FOOD TO EAT...
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOODTOEAT.COM HUNGRY? GET FOOD TO EAT...?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary S. Mathew, Carol Anne Been, Monica B. Richman
Mary S. Mathew Dentons US LLPP.O. BOX #061080Wacker Drive Station, Willis TowerCHICAGO, IL 60606-1080Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing online business directories featuring restaurants, food delivery companies and restaurants for food ordering; providing a web-based online portal that provides registered users access to their account information related to food delivery companies and restaurants for food ordering; providing a web-based online portal in the field of consumer-to-business commerce for consumers to enter, manage and modify their consumer preference information for use by merchants to create and manage offers for delivery to consumers, which also includes a social networking aspect, in the field of restaurants, restaurant delivery, and food ordering; providing a website where users can post recommendations and reviews on restaurants for commercial purposes, which also includes a social networking aspect; online advertising and marketing services; online food delivery order-taking services for others and food ordering services for others; online billing services for food delivery and ordering | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software applications for social networking, photo and video sharing, and transmission of photographic and video images, and to enable uploading, posting, displaying, tagging, sharing or otherwise providing electronic media or information over the Internet or other communications network in the field of food and restaurants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Penny POS Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Penny POS Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FOODTOEAT.COM HUNGRY? GET FOOD TO EAT...
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 5, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 7, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 9, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 8, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2011 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |