Drawing for SAFE PHONE ZONE

USPTO serial 85280417

SAFE PHONE ZONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OKEKE, BENJAMIN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAFE PHONE ZONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay Begler

JAY BEGLER NEISAR & VESTAL LLP90 NEW MONTGOMERY ST FL 9SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-4504UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009HIGHWAY SIGNSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2012MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 26, 2012ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 25, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 16, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 16, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance