USPTO serial 85280649
GREENCAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOONE, JOHN C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GREENCAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynne M.J. Boisineau
LYNNE M.J. BOISINEAU MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP4 Park Plaza, Suite 1700IRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Catalytic converters; mufflers; exhaust pipes; exhaust systems comprised of a combination of mufflers, catalytic converters, exhaust and muffler tips, hangers and tubing, and exhaust and muffler tips, all of the foregoing for motors and engines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |