USPTO serial 85281102
DIRK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDSON, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIRK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kit M. Stetina, Esq.
KIT M STETINA STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISESTE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656-2681Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SUNGLASSES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |