Drawing for LOCUS DEVELOPMENT

USPTO serial 85281700

LOCUS DEVELOPMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOCUS DEVELOPMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle L. Mehok

MICHELLE L. MEHOK PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN, LLP12255 EL CAMINO REAL STE 300SAN DIEGO, CA 92130-4088UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software programs for analyzing, storing, querying and computing biological sequence data, for use in the fields of bioinformatics and biotechnologiesACTIVE—
042Genomic and bioinformatics testing, namely, genetic testing for medical research and scientific research purposes; providing medical and scientific research information in the field of molecular genetics; consulting services in the field of genomics and biological sequence processing and analysis for scientific research and medical research purposes; development of new technology for others in the field of molecular genetics; DNA analysis and screening for scientific research purposes; compiling data for research purposes in the field of medical science and medical consultancy; DNA analysis services; DNA screening for scientific research purposes; genetic mapping for scientific purposesACTIVE—
044Diagnostic services in the field of medicine; medical testing for diagnosis of diseases; genomic and bioinformatics testing, namely, genetic testing for medical diagnostic and treatment purposes; DNA screening for medical diagnostic and treatment purposes; DNA analysis and screening for medical diagnostic and treatment purposes; DNA screening for medical purposes; consulting services in the field of genomics and biological sequence processing and analysis for medical diagnosis and treatment purposes; providing medical information for the purposes of medical diagnosis and treatment in the field of molecular geneticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 16, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 13, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 13, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 13, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 13, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 18, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 10, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 30, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 21, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 29, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 30, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 30, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 5, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance