USPTO serial 85282667
HÜGEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HÜGEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Esser
PETER J. ESSER PETER J. ESSER, ATTORNEY AT LAW1776 I ST NW STE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20006-3719UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Clothes washing machines; Electric food grinders; Electric juicers; Electric meat grinders; Electric mixers for household purposes; Electric vacuum cleaners; Electric vacuum cleaners and their components; Electric washing machines for household purposes; Electrically powered steam cleaning device comprising a hose and nozzle and a vapor-producing chamber that is attached to a water source; Kitchen machines, namely, electric standing mixers; Mixers; Multi-purpose steam cleaners; Power-operated meat grinders; Steam cleaning machines; Steam cleaning machines in the nature of steam mops; Vacuum cleaners; Vacuum cleaners for household purposes; Washing machines for clothes; Washing machines for household purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Hand-operated kitchen appliance for dicing, mincing, slicing and chopping food | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electric flat irons; Electric irons | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Combination microwave/convection oven; Convection ovens; Deep fat fryers; Deep fryer, electric; Deep frying machines; Electric beverage heaters; Electric bread cookers; Electric coffee makers; Electric coffee makers; Electric crepe makers; Electric deep fryers; Electric rice cooker; Electric rice cookers; Electric rice steamer; Electric sandwich makers; Electric slow cookers; Electric tea kettles; Electric tea pots; Electric toaster ovens; Electric toasters; Electric toasters; Electric waffle irons; Electric waffle maker; Filtering units for domestic use; Hair dryers; Hand-held electric hair dryers; Microwave ovens; Microwave ovens; Microwave ovens for cooking; Microwave ovens for household purposes; Waffle irons, electric; Water filtering units for domestic use use; Water filters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |