Drawing for RAPID 11

USPTO serial 85282907

RAPID 11

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAPID 11?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Natasha N. Reed

Natasha N. Reed Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLPOne Battery Park PlazaNew York, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal staples for industrial useACTIVE—
007Power tools, namely, stapling machines, tacking machines, stapling pliers, hot melt glue guns, power-operated stapling presses, power operated stapling guns, stapling hammers; power staplers for bookbinding apparatus; power staplers for machines for industrial purposes; power staplers for printers, collating machines and packaging machinesACTIVE—
008Hand tools, namely, stapling pliers, stapling guns, stapling hammers, and frapping pliersACTIVE—
011Heat guns, namely, hot air gunsACTIVE—
016Non-electric stapling machines and stapling pliers for stapling paper, non-electric tacking machines for tacking office requisites, staplers, staples, staple removers, paper hole punches; non-electric staplers for paper handling equipment, namely, staplers for photocopiers, staplers for binders, staplers for bookbinding apparatus and machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 20, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 11, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 7, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 17, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 21, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 1, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 18, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 29, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 29, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 28, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 19, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 19, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 5, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance