USPTO serial 85283652
SOUS VIDE SUPREME CUISINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOUS VIDE SUPREME CUISINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michele P. Schwartz
MICHELE P SCHWARTZ ANDREWS KURTH LLP1717 MAIN ST STE 3700DALLAS, TX 75201-4749UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | frozen and refrigerated entrees and side dishes consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, or vegetables, to be cooked under vacuum by the sous vide process | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | frozen and refrigerated entrees and side dishes consisting primarily of pasta and rice, to be cooked under vacuum by the sous vide process | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Eades Appliance Technology, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Eades Appliance Technology, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SOUS VIDE SUPREME CUISINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 10, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 10, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |