USPTO serial 85283658
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Quigely
Joseph Quigley LIMITED BRANDS3 LIMITED PARKWAYATTN: Stacy DildineCOLUMBUS, OH 43230| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Personal care products, namely, after shave creams, gels and emulsions, after shave balm, after shave lotion, non-medicated alum block for use after shaving, antiperspirant, astringent for the face, astringent for the skin, bath beads, bath gel, bath oil, bath soak, blush, body balm, skin and facial cleansers, body cream, body lotion, body moisturizer, non-medicated body ointment, non-medicated body salve, body scrub, body wash, cleansing cream, cold cream, cologne, cosmetics, dentifrice, deodorant, depilatories, dusting powder, essential oil, eye cream, eye gel, eyeliner, eye shadow, face cleanser, face cream, face gel, face lotion, face mask, face mist, face moisturizer, face powder, face scrub, face serum, face toner, face wash, foot cream, non-medicated foot powder, foot salve, fragrance, fragrant body spray for cosmetic purposes, hair bleaches, hair conditioner, hair detangler, hair pomade, hair shampoo, hair styling preparations, hair waxes, hand cleanser, hand cream, hand lotion, lip balm, lip buffer, lip exfoliator, non-medicated lip salve, lip shine, lip stick, make up remover, mascara, massage cream, massage oil, non-medicated mouthwash, nail cream, nail polish, nose balm, perfume, post sun tanning cream, post sun tanning lotion, pre-shave oil, pumice stone for personal use, scented room spray, non-medicated body salve, namely, rose salve, toilet water, namely, rose water, shaving balm, shaving cream, shaving foam, shaving gel, shave lather, shower gel, skin cream, skin lotion, skin tonic, skin scrub, skin wash, soap, sun care lotions, gels, and sprays, talcum powder, medicated soap | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Acne treatment preparations; aloe-vera gel for therapeutic purposes, namely, the treatment of skin abrasions; medicated preparations, namely, anti-itch lotion, anti-itch cream, anti-itch ointment and antiseptic gel; aspirin; medicated skin blemish pads, medicated skin blemish preparations; medicated body lotion, medicated chest balm, cold sore treatment preparations, cough and cold treatment preparations, dandruff shampoo; medicated foot powder, insect repellent, liniment oil spray, liniments, medicated lip salve, medicated lozenges, mentholated body lotion, medicated mouthwash, nutritional supplements, nutritionally fortified beverages, styptic pencil and vitamins | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Cosmetic bags and toiletry cases both sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 6, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 24, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 31, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |