USPTO serial 85283758
ANTLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ANTLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ken Liang
KEN LIANG KENZL LAW OFFICES15333 CULVER DR STE 120IRVINE, CA 92604-7145UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Age spot reducing creams; Anti-aging cream; Anti-aging creams; Anti-bacterial soap; Anti-wrinkle cream; Anti-wrinkle creams; Antibacterial skin soaps; Aromatic body care products, namely, body lotion, shower gel, cuticle cream, shampoo, conditioner, non-medicated lip balm, soap, body polish, body and foot scrub and non-medicated foot cream; Baby hand soap; Baby lotion; Baby shampoo; Bar soap; Bath cream; Bath lotion; Bath soaps; Bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form; Bathing lotions; Beauty creams; Beauty creams for body care; Beauty soap; Body cream; Body cream soap; Body creams; Body lotion; Body lotions; Body mask cream; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic hand creams; Cosmetic massage creams; Cosmetic nourishing creams; Cosmetic preparations, namely, firming creams; Cosmetic soaps; Cosmetic suntan lotions; Cream soaps; Eye cream; Eye lotions; Face and body beauty creams; Face and body creams; Face and body lotions; Face creams; Face creams and cleansers containing benzoyl peroxide for cosmetic purposes; Facial lotion; Hair care creams; Hair creams; Hair lotion; Hair lotions; Hair removing cream; Hair shampoo; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Hand cream; Hand creams; Hand soaps; Handmade soap bars; Liquid soap; Liquid soap used in foot bath; Liquid soaps; Lotions for face and body care; Massage creams; Medicated soap; Medicated soaps; Moisturizing creams; Natural soap bars; Naturally handmade soap bars; Night cream; Non-medicated diaper rash cream; Non-medicated diaper rash ointments and lotions; Non-medicated foot cream; Non-medicated foot lotions; Non-medicated hair restoration lotions; Non-medicated herbal body care products, namely, body oils, salves, and lip balms; Non-medicated scalp treatment cream; Non-medicated skin creams; Non-medicated skin creams with essential oils for use in aromatherapy; Organic soap bars; Perfumed creams; Perfumed soap; Perfumed soaps; Scented body lotions and creams; Shampoo-conditioners; Shampoos; Shampoos for babies; Shave creams; Shaving cream; Shaving lotion; Shower creams; Skin cleansing lotion; Skin cream; Skin creams; Skin creams in liquid and in solid form; Skin lotion; Skin lotions; Soaps for body care; Soaps for personal use; Wrinkle resistant cream | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |