USPTO serial 85284013
FULL CIRCLE NY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4632665Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 4, 2014
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FULL CIRCLE NY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neal S. Greenfield
NEAL S. GREENFIELD LAW OFFICES OF NEAL S. GREENFIELD167 NUGENT STNEW HYDE PARK, NY 11040-1915UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Personal business management services; public relations services; publicity management services; negotiation and settlement of commercial contracts for third parties through sponsoring arrangements and license agreements | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 25, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FULL CIRCLE NY LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Karen Nethersole
- Other trademarks owned by Karen Nethersole
- Other trademarks owned by Karen Nethersole
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named FULL CIRCLE NY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 3, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 20, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2014 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 23, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 13, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 9, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 6, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 13, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |