USPTO serial 85285125
AUTHENTICITY IS EVERYTHING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUTHENTICITY IS EVERYTHING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Apolzon
Lawrence E. Apolzon FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing and outerwear, namely, coats, jackets, parkas, pull-overs, coveralls, vests, sweaters, shirts, pants, anoraks, balaclavas, neck gaiters, scarves, toques, hats, caps, gloves, and mittens | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |