USPTO serial 85285661
DW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHUO, EMILY M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Staten Island, NY
Staten Island, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles H Knull
Charles H Knull Knull Group (Knull P.C.)630 Ninth AvenueSuite 405NEW YORK, NY 10036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Allspice; Almond paste; Aniseed for use as a flavoring in food and drinks; Aromatic preparations for food, namely, processed herbs and dried herbs; Artificial coffee; Baking powder; Baking soda; Crushed barley; Husked barley; Barley meal in the nature of barley flour; Bean meal in the nature of bean paste; Bee glue for human consumption; Chocolate-based beverages; Coffee-based beverages; Flavorings other than essential oils; Tea-based beverages; Bicarbonate of soda for cooking purposes; Starched-based binding agents for ice cream; Biscuits; Bread; Bread rolls; Breadcrumbs; Buns; Cake paste in the nature of cake frosting; Cake powder mixes; Cakes; Edible decorations for cakes; Flavorings for cakes other than essential oils; Candy for food; Capers; Caramels; Celery salt; Cereal-based snack food; Chewing gum not for medical purposes; Chicory for use as a substitute for coffee; Chips, namely, grain-based chips and flour-based chips; Chocolate; Chow-chow in the nature of a relish; Chutneys; Cinnamon; Cloves; Cocoa; Cocoa products, namely, cocoa mixes and cocoa powder; Coffee; Coffee flavorings; Vegetable preparations for use as a coffee substitute; Condiments, namely, prepared horseradish; Confectionery; Cookies; Cooking salt; Corn flakes; Corn meal; Milled corn in the nature of processed corn; Popcorn; Roasted corn; Couscous; Crackers; Curry; Custard; Salad dressings; Edible ices; Essences for foodstuffs, except etheric essences and essential oils; Farinaceous food pastes for human consumption; Oat flakes; Flavorings, other than essential oils, for beverages; Flour; Fondants; Frozen yogurt; Fruit jellies; Garden herbs; Preserved Ginger; Gingerbread; Glucose for food; Gluten for food; Golden syrup; Meat gravies; Groats in the nature of grains for human food; Gruel, with a milk base, for food; Halvah; Hominy; Hominy grits; Honey; Husked barley; Husked oats; Ice cream; Binding agents for edible ice; Edible ice; Ice cream powder; Royal jelly for human consumption, not for medical purposes; Ketchup; Leaven; Liquorice; Non-medicated Lozenges; Malt biscuits; Malt extract for food; Malt for human consumption for food purposes; Maltose; Mayonnaise; Meat pies; Meat tenderizers for household purposes; Mint for confectionery in the nature of candy mints; Molasses for food; Muesli; Mustard; Nutmeg; Oat flakes; Oatmeal; Crushed rolled oats; Pancakes; Pasta; Soya bean paste; Pastries; Pasty in the nature of a filled pastry; Pepper; Peppermint sweets; Pies; Pizzas; Potato flour for food; Pralines; Salt for preserving foodstuffs; Propolis for human consumption; Puddings in the nature of dessert puddings; Quiches; Relish; Rice; Rice cakes; Rice-based snack food; Rusks; Saffron; Sago; Sandwiches; Sauces; Sea water for cooking; Seasonings; Processed semolina; Sherbets; Sorbets; Soya flour; Soya sauce; Spices; Spring rolls; Star aniseed for use as a flavoring in food and drinks; Starch for use in manufacturing food; Starch-based thickeners for whipped cream; Sugar; Sushi; Natural sweeteners; Sweetmeats; Tabbouleh; Tacos; Tapioca; Tea; Thickening agents for cooking foodstuffs; Tortillas; Turmeric for food; Vanilla; Vanillin in the nature of vanilla flavorings; Vinegar; Waffles; Yeast not for medical use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 24, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 22, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 15, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |