USPTO serial 85286239
EMERGE CLINICAL DECISION SOFTWARE FASTER IDENTIFICATION. BETTER RESULTS. LOWER COST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- โ
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EMERGE CLINICAL DECISION SOFTWARE FASTER IDENTIFICATION. BETTER RESULTS. LOWER COST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel A. Rogers
DANIEL A ROGERS TUGGEY ROSENTHAL PAUERSTEIN SANDOLOSKI A755 E MULBERRY AVESUITE 200SAN ANTONIO, TX 78212-4285Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for helping clinicians manage patient care | ABANDONED | โ |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Emerge Clinical Solutions, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Emerge Clinical Solutions, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named EMERGE CLINICAL DECISION SOFTWARE FASTER IDENTIFICATION. BETTER RESULTS. LOWER COST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | โ |
| Sep 5, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | โ |
| Sep 5, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | โ |
| Sep 5, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | โ |
| Jul 26, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | โ |
| Apr 25, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | โ |
| Mar 27, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | โ |
| Mar 27, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | โ |
| Feb 17, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Feb 15, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Jan 31, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | โ |
| Jan 31, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | โ |
| Jan 31, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | โ |
| Jan 31, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | โ |
| Jan 31, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | โ |
| Jan 31, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Jan 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jan 9, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Apr 9, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | โ |
| Apr 8, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | โ |
| Apr 8, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |